Re:The paper that came up with Apple Vision Pro's outward-fa...
by AndrewKemendo on Thursday June 08, 2023 @04:09PM
(#36248101)
That’s a fair response, though I hope you’d agree that in the context of discussing pass through Vs see through “black” the majority of use cases are indeed fully occluding/lit LCDs near eye and not ML style lenses.
Re:The paper that came up with Apple Vision Pro's outward-fa...
by moron4hire on Thursday June 08, 2023 @05:12PM
(#36249152)
But you were talking about the Magic Leap, replying to someone talking about waveguides...
Re:The paper that came up with Apple Vision Pro's outward-fa...
by cbm-vic-20 on Thursday June 08, 2023 @04:38PM
(#36248602)
Magic Leap.. How are they still around? And have a valuation in the billions?
Re:The paper that came up with Apple Vision Pro's outward-fa...
by moron4hire on Thursday June 08, 2023 @05:01PM
(#36248986)
I don't know. I mean, their newest device is better than the HoloLens 2. But like, that's just a relative statement. Waveguide displays are still objectively dogshit.
Re:The paper that came up with Apple Vision Pro's outward-fa...
by dfsl on Thursday June 08, 2023 @06:12PM
(#36249940)
HoloLens stopped being a focus of Microsoft and it shows in the product
https://tecl.ink/2023/06/apples-vision-pro-wearable-headset-...
An optically transparent waveguide display can use an LCD layer to block light coming through the front and then not render graphics on that area of the display. It will be opaque black at that point (though rather fuzzy around the edges, as the LCD won't be in focus).
Magic Leap 2 actually employs this technique. It's... a lot like the rest of the device: a good idea on paper.