News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists claim >99 percent identification rate of ChatG... by jfengel on Thursday June 08, 2023 @03:23PM (#36247285)
Because it would be more directly inspired by real examples, and make their testing set more believable. Otherwise, they're more likely to be making elementary mistakes about what constitutes a good test of machine-generated text in general.

There are no comments on this comment yet.