Re:Scientists claim >99 percent identification rate of ChatG...
by jfengel on Thursday June 08, 2023 @03:23PM
(#36247285)
Because it would be more directly inspired by real examples, and make their testing set more believable. Otherwise, they're more likely to be making elementary mistakes about what constitutes a good test of machine-generated text in general.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.