News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Scientists claim >99 percent identification rate of ChatGPT content. Parent comment

Re:Scientists claim >99 percent identification rate of ChatG... by anjc on Thursday June 08, 2023 @02:47PM (#36246688)
> Even if that's the case, their paper should probably be more specific to the chemistry domain.

Why?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Scientists claim >99 percent identification rate of ChatG... by jfengel on Thursday June 08, 2023 @03:23PM (#36247285)
Because it would be more directly inspired by real examples, and make their testing set more believable. Otherwise, they're more likely to be making elementary mistakes about what constitutes a good test of machine-generated text in general.
[ Parent | on HN ]