News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Forests Around Chernobyl Aren’t Decaying Properly (2014) by pfdietz on Monday June 05, 2023 @06:41PM (#36205152)
Actually, burning of trees helped reduce CO2 over the long term. That's because burning is incomplete and produces charcoal. Charcoal doesn't decay, so when it is buried it semi-permanently takes carbon out of the biosphere. Over time, this would draw down atmospheric CO2. Some coal deposits from that period have a significant fraction of charcoal in them.
Re:Forests Around Chernobyl Aren’t Decaying Properly (2014) by EdwardDiego on Monday June 05, 2023 @06:59PM (#36205429)
IIRC, that's lignite coal?
Re:Forests Around Chernobyl Aren’t Decaying Properly (2014) by pfdietz on Tuesday June 06, 2023 @09:11AM (#36212132)
I don't think so? The charcoal would remain identifiable as the coal is matured by burial and heating (perhaps not all the way to anthracite).
Re:Forests Around Chernobyl Aren’t Decaying Properly (2014) by EdwardDiego on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @08:03PM (#36235379)
Ah true. It'd be more of a structural thing I guess.