News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by lotsofpulp on Saturday June 03, 2023 @09:46PM (#36182237)
If Tesla had an adequate safety record, they would back their claims by offering liability insurance when self driving is enabled.

The fact that Tesla does not put their money where their mouth is says all you need to know.

Wake me up when someone is willing to take on liability. Until then automated driving does not exist.

Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by valine on Saturday June 03, 2023 @09:57PM (#36182317)
FSD isn’t to the point where it can safely operate without a driver monitoring it. You’re arguing against allowing it on the roads with a safety driver on the basis that FSD isn’t ready to be operated without a safety driver. That makes zero sense.

FSD with a safety driver does not pose a threat to public safety. That’s not coming from me, it’s coming from the NHTSA.

Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by dghlsakjg on Saturday June 03, 2023 @10:36PM (#36182521)
What does FSD stand for?

I would have thought that something called Full Self Driving would be capable of fully driving by itself.

Sarcasm aside, that’s how most people use it.

The NHTSA hasn’t regulated it, but that doesn’t mean it’s an endorsement. It just means that they haven’t found anything within their legislative mandate that they can regulate here. US agencies are largely reactive, and I’m not sure I trust them with my life to get this right.

Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by valine on Saturday June 03, 2023 @11:23PM (#36182791)
Most people use FSD as a driver assist because the software will permanently ban you from the beta program if you don’t keep your hands on the wheel.

No one who has used the software for more than a minute has any misconceptions about FSD.

Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by recursive on Sunday June 04, 2023 @12:35AM (#36183137)
> No one who has used the software for more than a minute has any misconceptions about FSD.

But people who have heard the name might. Honestly, it's a ridiculous name. Just "Self-driving" might be arguable. What are they going to call it when it's really fully self driving? "Literally Fully Self Driving Totally Serious"

Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by lotsofpulp on Saturday June 03, 2023 @10:29PM (#36182490)
I have no problem allowing it on the road. I do have a problem calling something that does not drive itself “self driving”. Much less FULL self driving.

Although, I guess my bigger issue is actually with the government that takes no action about false advertising.

Re:The death of self-driving cars is greatly exaggerated by martindbp on Sunday June 04, 2023 @08:05AM (#36184957)
"Full" can mean a lot of things. You chose to interpret it as L5, but to me it clearly compares itself to AP and other lesser ADAS systems which has a much smaller ODD. FSD has a nearly full ODD (it doesn't do parking and reversing yet). I understand you might get the impression that Musk means L5, and clearly that is the long term goal, but that doesn't mean FSD has to be L5. Anyway, arguing about a name is pointless. There are literally thousands of videos online where someone who's about to purchase a product for $15,000 can see exactly what they will get. The "fear" that grown adults will purchase something for $15,000 purely based on a vague name without reading any disclaimers or read/watch a single review is disingenuous and purely false concern.