My argument is that since I’m paying month by month I clearly know what I’m buying and have properly evaluated the value proposition. The classic argument that FSD is a scam because consumers don’t understand what they’re buying falls apart when FSD is a no contract subscription service.
Sounds like FSD doesn’t actually FSD.
In other words, you know what you’re buying is not what’s advertised so it isn’t a scam?
I have learned that there is no point trying to tell a Tesla fanboy what the problem is. They will not listen. In the nytimes article, a guy bought another Tesla right after the previous one was totalled because of an FSD error.
The thing I have been telling myself is that fortunately I am not risking my own life for that.
The “totaled car” was a 2015 Model S which would have been running MobilEye software, not FSD. Stirring up hysteria is a classic tactic that news sites use to generate revenue. Always look at the title of the page. When you see something like “New York Time Magazine” there’s a good chance what you’re reading is not actually a reputable NYT article.
When you see something like “New York Time Magazine” there’s a good chance what you’re reading is not actually a reputable NYT article.
So if I said yes, what's your response? No, of course.
Not saying everyone thinks it's a scam here, just that your argument it's not doesn't do much with the bias of already paying...