Re:CodeCompose: Meta’s AI Coding Assistant
by alan-stark on Saturday June 03, 2023 @04:31PM
(#36180265)
Reading these answers reminded me why I love HN - actually thoughtful perspectives :) Guess a lot boils down to two variables - (a) suggestion UX quality and (b) definition of 'rejection' event. I skimmed through the paper and it turns out that 91% figure is based on feedback from 70 people and anonymous feedback wasn't allowed. So, 'overwhelming 91% favorable' can be paraphrased to `64 people out of the total 16k user base said they liked it'. Would be interesting to see indirect metrics like retention on day 15.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CodeCompose: Meta’s AI Coding Assistant
by idiotsecant on Saturday June 03, 2023 @05:29PM
(#36180710)
Quite an insightful comment. In an institution that large it's surprising there were only 64 brown nosers. I expect out of 16k captive audience employees you could probably get 64 people to give a positive opinion of replacing paychecks with meta store scrip.