In the same paragraph, "Teamsters president Sean O’Brian said that the ruling will not impact the Teamsters’ striking efforts."

So, how much does this really affect anything?

Because there are more unions than just the teamsters?

Yeah, this is pretty cut and dry for teamsters, but what about... anyone else?

Yes I saw that too, I wonder how this will play out with the ruling. This quote is very concerning:

>That sets a precedent that if a union strikes, it has to ensure the company won't lose any money.

The whole point of a strike is to force profits of a company to go down so they will be able to be serious at the table.

> This when people in the US needs to be as brave as the people in France.

What exactly are you proposing? Blocking traffic? Setting fires? Riots?

Perhaps the American people can rely on our government to protect us (from you).

> Blocking traffic? Setting fires? Riots?

Yes. All corporation bootlickers screaming muh damaged bussines can eat my ass . Protests/strikes don't start out of nowhere or just because people want to destroy stuff.

Found the typical psychopathic far-leftist, who justifies and advocates criminal behavior.

Yes! I am your average left snowflake who supports criminal behaviors like protests/strikes. Why would workers need rights ???

Also I like to groom kids by introducing them to the lgbt, pedophilic, narrative.

Any other grievances ?

We've banned this account for ideological flamewar. That's not allowed here, regardless of what you're for or against.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

We've banned this account for ideological flamewar. That's not allowed here, regardless of what you're for or against.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html