News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California vs. social – requires ad revenues to go to jou... by s1artibartfast on Friday June 02, 2023 @11:26AM (#36166432)
Industries have died countless times in a free market. It is an indication that people no longer want to consume what they are making. You can make an argument that local journalism is a public good. In that case the honest response would be for the public to pay for it from the general fund.
Re:California vs. social – requires ad revenues to go to jou... by f33d5173 on Friday June 02, 2023 @01:42PM (#36168332)
People are consuming news media, so its no indication of that. The way these laws are structured, a news organization recieves payment in proportion to how often their articles are read, so they continue to only receive profit when their product is being consumed. If they were funded from a general fund, that might end up subsdizing useless or poor quality news instead of things people actually want to read.
Re:California vs. social – requires ad revenues to go to jou... by s1artibartfast on Friday June 02, 2023 @02:32PM (#36168971)
The general fund could pay per click just as easily. The situation as it stands is that the customers aren't willing to pay to click and read. The social media sites aren't willing to pay per click either.