f33d5173

Could be 4 screens overlapping each other. Pull the corners and the lower screens pull out from below the upper ones. There would be a visible seam at the boundary, but maybe there's a trick you could use to disguise it.

Cloudflare has no part in this beyond providing the technology. There are various alternative "security check" pages that are used by others; cloudflare's is the best of the bunch IMO, though still annoying.

This page isn't cloudflare's, cloudflare stopped using google's captcha some years ago. It says ray id at the bottom, idk what's up with that, but it's clearly different.

FDE without TPM requires the passphrase to have as many bits of security as you want the encryption to have. With a TPM you can have something as short as a PIN, since the TPM can limit the rate at which password attempts are made. I assume most users are satisfied with the weak security implied by a short passphrase, but a dedicated attacker could likely crack it.

Good news! Apple is still permitted to vet apps for security reasons, even when they are distributed on alternative app stores. So you can keep downloading apps with confidence, wherever they come from.

The fine is for the state of new mexico, it's about 50 years of revenue in that state. That's decent sized imo.

This is just for new mexico, a relatively small state in a single country facebook operates in. It's probably a solid decade worth of profit in that state. Because their privacy policy that no one reads wasn't clear enough.

I guess all the startup founders must have gone to trump and begged him to stop it.

With regards to whether when it finds a legitimate bug, it should be given weight?

His departure causing a drop does not mean he was worth that drop. Investors think his departure signals internal issues and are trading based off that.

> Like many of us, I've been hobbying away on some SaaS that wraps an LLM. But I often worry, isn't this just adding buttons to an LLM call?

> That's why I created isitsaas.io: your platform for determining whether your llm wrapper has product potential, or whether people would rather just use claude directly instead. Simply pop in your business idea, and our award winning, proprietary technology will ask claude if you can make money off of it.

> Trial memberships start at $10/month

No because mechanization has made farming require far fewer people than in times past. The US and many western countries export more than they import.

Movies are expensive to make, and watching them on streaming gives almost no money back to the studio. The intention is that if you want to watch a movie, you should pay the $5-10 it costs to do so on any of a number of platforms. Then you get the great user experience of putting any movie you like into the search bar and pressing "play", and the studio gets appropriately compensated. Putting a movie on a streaming service is a way for studios to double dip, to get a smaller amount of money from people who don't care which movie exactly they watch. If you have a particular movie in mind to watch, or don't like the fare on whichever service you're subscribed to, you should be paying a la carte for movies instead. If you aren't, don't pretend it's some moral stand and not just you being a cheapskate.

Idiotic article. Nobody collects "why"s so they can not change anything. Not changing anything is never the failure mode. The failure mode is changing the wrong thing. If you are a leader, and something egregious goes wrong, it is your job to ensure that your people don't just put some bandaid fix on it that will keep causing issues indefinitely. Understanding the complete "why" is a precondition for that. Not bothering to hear a complete explanation because you trust your people to do the right thing is fine, but then why were you on that call in the first place? Let them do their job.

So he was on a leave of absense, and now is no longer on such a leave? This is only an attempted coup if you think the leave of absense was a pretense, but they give no evidence of that in the article. I saw it suggested that he usually has wild ideas after returning from burning man, and the board wanted to insulate the company from the effects of that. That he's now back is evidence for a theory along those lines, and contradicts a theory that the board was trying to get rid of him. But I have no insight beyond that.

Why did you copy paste a comment from 4chan? Is this a pasta I'm not aware of?

So murderers put their guns in a bag and get away with it, normal people who have "nothing to hide" leave their guns out in the open and get the police called on them.

Idk if soundcore is the same quality but it's pretty good and half the price of the base airpods. Hard to justify paying twice as much and not getting any ANC.

Most shoes have rubber soles, to do damage to the floor it would have to be softer than rubber.

Fine tuning is not necessarily oriented at making a model better at generic "intelligence" tasks. In fact, the goal is often specifially to improve model performance at narrow tasks while recognizing it will get worse at other tasks.

I clicked through the leaderboard. It seemingly isn't sorted by best or worst performing, but rather by absolute change in performance - improved and worsened models are interleaved. Regardless, I selected the model that worsened the most, and investigated what they claimed their fine tuning accomplished; in fact they claimed nothing, their model sheet was the default trl model sheet without even the training set listed. The second worst performing was the same, but they at least listed their training set. It was a set of millions of word math problems. So we would expect the model to get better at those problems and worse at everything else.

On the other hand, the most improved model on the table had an actual model sheet, where they claim the model has been trained to be "more helpful". They claim that by ablating model refusal the model ends up doing better on benchmarks as well. That claim seems to have been borne out.

Obviously if you train a model for some purpose it will not necessarily do well at that purpose. But I would expect popularily used models to be ones that actually do what they say they do. I don't think people need to be told that sometimes models are badly trained. And the claim that this project actually has data to support, that finetuning on one task does not necessarily improve performance on another task, is so obvious that it doesn't need to be stated.

If it wasn't chromium it would be gecko or webkit. Google only controls web standards because everyone builds on chromium.

Nothing but blood pressure and heart rate was significant, and heart rate only barely so. I wouldn't read anything into the other numbers. It was a 20 day study, you aren't going to get long term outcomes from that.

They said except for the drive thru.

One seemingly deliberately conflation this post commits is betwee "gypsy" and "roma". The first as a set of actions, the second as an ethnicity divorced from any action of behaviour. Dhh refers to the first, and uses the first word. The fine article interprets it to mean the second, and correspondingly substitutes the second word. But dhh makes it clear what he means by "gypsy", so one can only interpret this conflation as deliberate.

Oh yeah right, underground data centers. What are you going to say next, data centers in space? Be real.

Rather than making everyone comply with the strictest noise and other restrictions of residential areas, it's much easier for everyone if you put industrial things in an industrial area and residences in a residential area.

The US nationalized tik tok so the chinese couldn't influence people anymore. Apparently that didn't work?

> But if we can find something that doesn't do that, I'd prefer that.

There's nothing plausible that can do that, and he knew that, and was basically just saying "we're going to put ads on it" in a way that challenges you to explain what a better option would be.

Your AI has totally misunderstood what's going on here and is really contributing nothing to the discussion.

> resignation

I appeciate short letters like this that get straight to the point...

The point is to embed a particular signature, which was generated randomly, in the image. The distance function discussed is the same as the popcount of the xor. It's well know that the xor of random data with correlated data is statistically random. Hence, however well correlated the signatures of unwatermarked images may be with each other, they would show no correlation with the signature of a watermarked image. That is, unless the watermark by extremely bad luck happened to be near one of these clusters the author discovered. This does represent a genuine flaw, but an extremely minor one, and one that can be easily mitigated with no changes to the underlying algorithm,