News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by teddyh on Thursday June 01, 2023 @06:18AM (#36149311)
Also, validation errors is how you get people to ignore XHTML.

Strict validation is tricky. With HTTPS, validation was initially very lax, and AFAIK, most SMTP servers still do not validate the certificates of the destination SMTP servers. It is hard to get people to move to stricter validation once habits and working systems have been established which depend on lax – or no – validation.

Some try to avoid this by specifying strict validation in advance, like XHTML and DNSSEC, which obviously has its own drawbacks.

Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by tptacek on Thursday June 01, 2023 @04:19PM (#36156796)
Like DNSSEC, XHTML is an infamous global technology failure.
Re:DNSSEC failures are how you get people to disable DNSSEC by teddyh on Friday June 02, 2023 @10:08AM (#36165287)
My point exactly (well, not about DNSSEC being a failure, just XHTML).