Re:Falcon 40B LLM (which beats Llama) now Apache 2.0
by sgu999 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @04:09AM
(#36148646)
What kind of tasks?
Could you give some links to the papers you're referring to?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Falcon 40B LLM (which beats Llama) now Apache 2.0
by anon373839 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @04:30AM
(#36148740)
Sure:
1. Goat: Fine-tuned LLaMA Outperforms GPT-4 on Arithmetic Tasks
https://huggingface.co/papers/2305.14201
2. Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs
Re:Falcon 40B LLM (which beats Llama) now Apache 2.0
by fareesh on Thursday June 01, 2023 @06:45AM
(#36149472)
Sorry I should have been more specific - I was limiting my question to the bigger models. The smaller (~7B) models are feasible with these approaches.
Re:Falcon 40B LLM (which beats Llama) now Apache 2.0
by anon373839 on Thursday June 01, 2023 @07:56AM
(#36149941)
Ah. Perhaps the larger models will find use in in-house deployments where companies want their employees to have access to ChatGPT-like general purpose assistants, but want to prevent data from leaving their premises. LIMA shows the LLaMA 65B hitting a quality level somewhere between DaVinci-003 and GPT-4 with minimal alignment, so the base models are probably powerful enough already for this to work. Just speculating.
Re:Falcon 40B LLM (which beats Llama) now Apache 2.0
by MacsHeadroom on Friday June 02, 2023 @07:05AM
(#36163597)
One benefit of finetuning larger models, like 65B, is to free up limited context space vs few-shot prompting.
If you want a specific kind of interaction with the model then you could take up 1/3rd of the 2048 token context window with few-shot or you could simply finetune it with QLoRA for a few hours on a consumer GPU and then get to use the full 2048 context with the finetuned model.