Re:Federal Judge Makes History: Border Searches of Cell Phon...
by Y_Y on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @06:11AM
(#36136579)
What kind of kompromat could I read on one of these phones during a border search and compromise a big company? Are you talking about a draft press release or dirty secrets about large scale crimes?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Federal Judge Makes History: Border Searches of Cell Phon...
by ExoticPearTree on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @06:45AM
(#36136764)
Before Snowden everyone was like, who cares if the government sees my encrypted traffic, they don't know what is inside; or location info. And then people found out that metadata can be more powerful than the actual unencrypted information and can tie a person to a lot of things. So yeah, how about they don't search the phone without probable cause?
Re:Federal Judge Makes History: Border Searches of Cell Phon...
by bbarnett on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @07:15AM
(#36136941)
I find it astonishing, and horribly upsetting, that people think needing a warrant is horrible.
Needing a warrant, means you have to articulate why you want to invade someone's private life, and it further provides a chain of accountability.
It prevents rogue employees(peace officer, border patrol) from doing whatever they want, it provides oversight, it provides a second set of eyes, it provides for adherence to legislation and court decisions!
Yet I see people thinking it's some sort of horrible requirement. So bizarre.
Re:Federal Judge Makes History: Border Searches of Cell Phon...
by justinclift on Wednesday May 31, 2023 @10:30AM
(#36138835)
It's fairly common to have login credentials to business email, slack (etc) accounts.
So that can be pretty serious for senior staff, infrastructure team members, and so on.