News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nirvana Fallacy by remkop22 on Thursday May 25, 2023 @04:55PM (#36076101)
This hits home. Manytime have I come to appreciate a library or technology only after delusionally attempting to create a 'better' version. Mid attempt I actually start to understand the problem space, at which point I humbly and thankfully start depending on said library or technology.
Re:Nirvana Fallacy by MichaelZuo on Thursday May 25, 2023 @06:45PM (#36077378)
What kind of problem spaces need so much trial and error to understand?
Re:Nirvana Fallacy by mcphage on Thursday May 25, 2023 @06:46PM (#36077394)
Re:Nirvana Fallacy by MichaelZuo on Thursday May 25, 2023 @07:01PM (#36077549)
What does this comic have to do with the topic?
Re:Nirvana Fallacy by sethammons on Thursday May 25, 2023 @08:20PM (#36078203)
Did you read the alt text?
Re:Nirvana Fallacy by jameshart on Thursday May 25, 2023 @08:47PM (#36078412)
That looking at almost any problem and thinking 'this seems simple?' is generally an indication that you have MASSIVELY underestimated something.

In other words, that by asking the question 'What kind of problem spaces need so much trial and error to understand?' you are betraying a sort of charming naiveté.

Re:Nirvana Fallacy by sfink on Friday May 26, 2023 @12:13AM (#36079806)
Yes, I very much see myself in this. Though rather than humbly depending on the library, I tend to wander off in disinterest. I realize that my motivation came from saving the world with a supposedly better solution, and I didn't actually care that much about solving the problem in the first place.