News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Make your own VPN with Fly.io, tailscale and GitHub by mcny on Thursday May 25, 2023 @03:00AM (#36067845)
> This is just irrational. The client is open source. You can build it and run it from source.

Something I don’t understand is if the client is open source, why is it not in the fedora repos? Why do I need to add a new repo to dnf?

Re:Make your own VPN with Fly.io, tailscale and GitHub by eropple on Thursday May 25, 2023 @08:35AM (#36069963)
Unless you want to deal with Fedora's release cycle, you're not going to push software through their repos. This isn't a Tailscale thing, this is a "just about everyone" thing.
Re:Make your own VPN with Fly.io, tailscale and GitHub by UI_at_80x24 on Thursday May 25, 2023 @08:45AM (#36070046)
>Something I don’t understand is if the client is open source, why is it not in the fedora repos? Why do I need to add a new repo to dnf?

Just because one group of people haven't done something doesn't mean it doesn't qualify. To show the exact opposite, look at OpenBSD. They have included Wireguard into their kernel.

Fedora not including Wireguard may be political, personal, or none-of-the-above. Maybe somebody hasn't offered to take on that task/responsibility.

Re:Make your own VPN with Fly.io, tailscale and GitHub by ptidhomme on Thursday May 25, 2023 @09:15AM (#36070323)
I'm not sure if GP was referring to a wireguard package or a tailscale one. But to complete the picture, there's also a tailscale package in OpenBSD's repos.