Re:Meta has started its latest round of layoffs, focusing on...
by DannyBee on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @11:40AM
(#36059643)
I mean, people don't like thinking they are part of the problem:
Most of tech thinks wealth inequality is not about them while being in the 1%.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta has started its latest round of layoffs, focusing on...
by skrebbel on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @12:38PM
(#36060606)
Tbf I disagree that being rich automatically makes you part of the problem. I merely think it disqualifies you from playing the victim card.
Re:Meta has started its latest round of layoffs, focusing on...
by DannyBee on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @01:38PM
(#36061542)
Sure.
I think that's right - you can be rich and helpful, and rich and unhelpful.
What is happening now seems to be a claim of not being rich at all, which is honestly just weird.
Re:Meta has started its latest round of layoffs, focusing on...
by skrebbel on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @02:11PM
(#36061949)
Yep! :-)
Re:Meta has started its latest round of layoffs, focusing on...
by somsak2 on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @11:58PM
(#36066924)
300k/year is only 1/3 of the way towards being in the to top 1% for the Bay Area -- https://sf.curbed.com/2016/9/26/13062348/top-one-percent-bay...
>the average one percent household in the larger San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City region makes a whopping $3.5 million plus.
Re:Meta has started its latest round of layoffs, focusing on...
by DannyBee on Thursday May 25, 2023 @08:24AM
(#36069864)
Sure, you can always find a subgroup you are not part of the 1% in, i'm not sure what your point is?
You can also use the average instead of the median, and get a much higher required income for the top 1% :)
The median household (ie entire family) income in the US is 70k. Even in california it's ~100k.
The point was clear - Tech is very wealthy, and believes they are just the random common person.