I don't need to 'cite' very well established history, just check Wikipedia. Pinochet was the best of two horrible options, a choice that never would have had to be me made were it not for Communist agitators - a pattern repeated all over the world in the 20th century, the repercussions of which are still ongoing today.

Venezuela, Cuba and even Afghanistan are just a few of many examples.

Except that what you are presenting is not at all very well established history. So yes, definitely citations needed.

Not that you will be able to cite anything credible considering how bogus what you are advancing is.

>Pinochet was the best of two horrible options

And on a scale from 0 to Cuba, how bad was Allende exactly?

(Rhetorical question, im not interested in your answer.)