Re:Meta Open-Sources Computer Vision Foundation Model DINOv2
by Buttons840 on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @02:02AM
(#36054607)
But I am able to train my own LLM on the output of their LLM, right? Or are the big AI players going to argue that you cannot train an AI on data you don't have a license to? (See the catch 22 here?)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta Open-Sources Computer Vision Foundation Model DINOv2
by mijoharas on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @02:36AM
(#36054819)
I think some of the licenses specifically forbid that. (as far as I remember, chatGPT has that in their terms of service).
Re:Meta Open-Sources Computer Vision Foundation Model DINOv2
by dragonwriter on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @02:10AM
(#36054656)
> But I am able to train my own LLM on the output of their LLM, right?
Sure. And, there's an argument that the license only applies to the code because model weights aren’t subject to copyright anyway. And available-under-any-license is a lot better than OpenAI’s current stance as far as enabling anyone else, since they’ve gone completely closed to the point where even their papers on their models are more PR than reproducible science. There's a continuum from secret sauce to “do what thou wilt”, and I am not a zealot arguing anything not Open Source must be rejected as not a positive step.