Except - that’s not a winning point here. There is no expectation that people not be flawed - there is the expectation that you don’t drive drunk. That’s what the law requires. Similarly, the law doesn’t require you to be perfect and not have flaws in the office, the law requires you to not sexually harass people in the office. It’s pretty simple but you manage to repeatedly try and make it seem complicated by bringing in irrelevant factors like whether people are flawed or not - there was never any question as to whether or not people are flawed.