News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by BeenAGoodUser on Monday May 22, 2023 @02:09PM (#36034659)
I think it is counterproductive to limit the rate of growth of AI since some countries — typically the ones who are less concerned about ethics — will not follow those rules and could gain a considerable edge over the rest of the world this way.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by standardUser on Monday May 22, 2023 @02:28PM (#36034928)
Historically, technologically advanced nations have worked together to develop some limited governance over sensitive technologies. It's an imperfect system, but tends to be better than a free-for-all.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by cubefox on Monday May 22, 2023 @04:23PM (#36036239)
Counterexample: Atom bombs, ICMBs, spy satellites.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by standardUser on Monday May 22, 2023 @06:20PM (#36037416)
You literally just named the actual examples.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by cubefox on Monday May 22, 2023 @06:48PM (#36037674)
MAD is the opposite of cooperation.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by __loam on Monday May 22, 2023 @08:51PM (#36038537)
The cold war involved numerous bilateral agreements, accords, understandings, etc to prevent a nuclear war.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by generic92034 on Monday May 22, 2023 @02:14PM (#36034717)
Or they are the first countries falling to the superintelligent AIs they themselves have developed... :o
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by Jackson__ on Monday May 22, 2023 @03:07PM (#36035367)
... with the rest of the world following shortly.
Re:Governance of Superintelligence by __loam on Monday May 22, 2023 @03:38PM (#36035705)
I think this argument is frankly quite ignorant. The only adversarial nations that maybe have the capability to build these systems are Russia and China. Russia just got sanctioned to hell and the Chinese government is limiting their AI development more than we are. By far the most gung ho country about developing AI is the United States and its tech sector. Bringing up the CCP strawman is just an excuse for less government oversight over what the industry itself has been saying is a dangerous technology for months now.