News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by pmoriarty on Sunday May 21, 2023 @08:26AM (#36020192)
But do such tell-tale signs that it was written by an LLM exclude the possibility that a human wrote it?

Some humans may just write in that style. Why not?

Re:GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by dmd on Sunday May 21, 2023 @08:44AM (#36020326)
More to the point, many humans write in that style, which is where GPT picked it up in the first place.
Re:GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by jacksnipe on Sunday May 21, 2023 @08:50AM (#36020379)
Yea, it’s literally the style that is held up as good writing in the usual American high school setting, at least IME.
Re:GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers by SAI_Peregrinus on Sunday May 21, 2023 @11:09AM (#36021760)
Yep, GPT's default "mode" seems to be the bland "five paragraph essay" encouraged by high-school courses. First, it tells you what it's about to describe. Then it describes it, inventing some supporting evidence. Then it restates what it just told you.

Sadly many students never move beyond this introductory framework, so their professional writing (which GPT trained on) ends up with the same uninspired style. It's a way to automate the creation of content that even the "lowest common denominator" of students can manage, but it doesn't produce good writing.