That is, however, why I love this idea. It looks like this provides a good foundation for creating a slider; a nice interface, well documented options and callbacks, and nothing more.
I feel like I can actually build something of my own with this instead of clobbering an existing slider plugin with my own code until it does what I want. This is a much sharper tool than a widget pre-bundled with style defaults.
I'm still not sure if I'll switch from SlidesJS to Sequence, just because I am quite familiar with the SlidesJS source. But, definitely good work by ianlunn--I'm going to attempt a similar effect with SlidesJS sometime soon.
I'm not familiar with slidesjs.com so I can't compare the two but the way in which Sequence is built is very much different to other sliders that I have come across. Sequence basically just controls the attribution of class names (animate-in and animate-out), allowing a sliders transitions to be completely written in CSS.
Couldn't these "Unique transitions" be applied to most existing slideshow plugins, since they are done with CSS3 and not the plugin itself?
Say, if I was using http://slidesjs.com/, I could do `addClass('animate-in')` using the `animationStart()` event.
I say this as I'd like more people to contribute to a solid, widely used and tested slideshow plugin, instead of adding another choice--of course this assumes that there's no need for another choice.