Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright...
by kevinmchugh on Friday May 19, 2023 @02:07PM
(#36005041)
Because the costs to publish online are zero there would be innumerable other copies of the work posted, meaning the initial outlay for the studio time etc cannot be recouped.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright...
by realusername on Saturday May 20, 2023 @02:58AM
(#36009930)
It's exactly like any other work, your plumber doesn't receive royalties whenever you use your bathroom, those costs should be paid upfront.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright...
by kevinmchugh on Sunday May 21, 2023 @08:13AM
(#36020104)
Yep! The costs to press vinyl and print sleeves and market the work _are_ paid upfront. So cutting off the revenue stream unexpectedly means no more expensive projects for old artists