Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright...
by kevinmchugh on Friday May 19, 2023 @02:07PM
(#36005041)
Because the costs to publish online are zero there would be innumerable other copies of the work posted, meaning the initial outlay for the studio time etc cannot be recouped.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright...
by realusername on Saturday May 20, 2023 @02:58AM
(#36009930)
It's exactly like any other work, your plumber doesn't receive royalties whenever you use your bathroom, those costs should be paid upfront.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright...
by kevinmchugh on Sunday May 21, 2023 @08:13AM
(#36020104)
Yep! The costs to press vinyl and print sleeves and market the work _are_ paid upfront. So cutting off the revenue stream unexpectedly means no more expensive projects for old artists
And the initial costs are similar to any other non-copyright related work, paid per service.