[dead]
"Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and we'll look at the data."
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...
Re:ChatGPT vs. open source on harder tasks
by TheObviousOne on Thursday May 18, 2023 @05:10PM
(#35994103)
Thanks - I will
Re:ChatGPT vs. open source on harder tasks
by what-the-grump on Thursday May 18, 2023 @04:51PM
(#35993874)
>Disclaimer: this post was written jointly by Marco Tulio Ribeiro and Scott Lundberg. It strictly represents our personal opinions, and not those of our employer (Microsoft).
Re:ChatGPT vs. open source on harder tasks
by icelancer on Thursday May 18, 2023 @04:53PM
(#35993907)
What? These notebooks and posts by the authors are extremely helpful regardless of what toolchain you're using.
It's also the case that a significant minority of HN has unfavorable views towards LangChain for being complicated and poorly documented software.
Re:ChatGPT vs. open source on harder tasks
by TheObviousOne on Thursday May 18, 2023 @05:08PM
(#35994084)
Those 5/6 example are not that complicated and are quite common (plus they didn't share why they chose those exact examples and not others!!!) , thus there utility and if they want to make them vialable to others they should make them independently in clear way and not to write "long article" to hide those example and entangled with their MS tools.
Sorry but this give bad name to what "pure research" should act like (it's smells like marketing from miles).
There are so much red flags (also here in the comments & the "surprised conclusions") - open your eyes and be more critical thinker.