Re:DuckDuckGo owns the #2 position in mobile market share in...
by josephcsible on Thursday May 18, 2023 @01:25PM
(#35991276)
> I think in practice free speech should be limited if it’s clearly damaging.
The problem with that position is, who decides what counts as "clearly damaging"? What if the government and media were extremely anti-vaccine and chose to censor pro-vaccine speech instead, calling it "clearly damaging"?
And I see how the concept of “misinformation” can be used very broadly to silence political opponents. But I do wish there was a perfect solution.