News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Staff Engineer's Path – Book Review by NBJack on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @01:33PM (#35978615)
It's up for debate, but I would define "staff" as "here is a vaguely understood problem we believe has to be solved; find out what it is, whether it actually is a thing, why it happened, whether it is worth the time to solve, and finally guide others to solve it for us." It can get manager-like, but the lack of direct person oversight is distinct enough IMHO.

The creators of the software you mentioned are rarely in a role defined as such. If you really want to go the hard-core coding path, the startup scene is the best place to look.

Re:The Staff Engineer's Path – Book Review by feoren on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @01:58PM (#35978979)
> I would define "staff" as "here is a vaguely understood problem we believe has to be solved; find out what it is, whether it actually is a thing, why it happened, whether it is worth the time to solve, and finally guide others to solve it for us."

I would define that as "software engineering". What else are any of us doing all day? The compiler's job?

Re:The Staff Engineer's Path – Book Review by jmchuster on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @04:12PM (#35980630)
It's the scale of it.

"Here is a vaguely understood problem, that might take 2 hours to solve."

"Here is a vaguely understood problem, that might take 2 years to solve."

Though if you're used to the latter timescale, you might not consider the former as all that "vaguely" understood.