News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Staff Engineer's Path – Book Review by H8crilA on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @01:26PM (#35978504)
A Staff Engineer doesn't really have to care about for example people that have a rough patch, or about notorious assholes ruining the team's morale. That's mostly a people's manager problem.

On the other hand people's sense of who they should really listen to always skews to their manager (the person that can fire and/or promote them, or at least has the most say in the process).

Re:The Staff Engineer's Path – Book Review by wlonkly on Thursday May 18, 2023 @12:46PM (#35990651)
If I can modify that slightly: The staff engineer isn't accountable for people that have a rough patch or who are assholes (and the manager is). I've found as a staff engineer that I definitely have to care, adapt to the rough patch, and campaign/do politics to get the assholes out, but I'm not accountable for it.

(I originally wrote this with "responsible" in place of "accountable" but that was fuzzier; surely as a staff engineer I'm responsible for more than my direct contributions even if I'm not directly accountable for them.)

Re:The Staff Engineer's Path – Book Review by H8crilA on Thursday May 18, 2023 @01:51PM (#35991623)
Yeah I agree, accountable is a much better word.