News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Renewables supplied 65% of new US utility-scale generatin... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @10:35AM (#35975784)
> Please show a coal plant

It's not the output from one plant, it's the amount you get from a big pile of coal plants versus the same amount of nuclear power, even with a very high projection of nuclear plant release.

The coal plants release radiation at a moderate speed but never stop.

> two hundred dispursive cruise missles

Lol okay dude, cruise missiles don't have to aim at nuclear plants to do the same damage.

Re:Renewables supplied 65% of new US utility-scale generatin... by usernew on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @07:32PM (#35982551)
got it. you have no answer.

light background radiation, present already everywhere is not the same as chernobyl (1000sqmi), where no one can live for 10000 years. i didn't think my matches example could possibly not be understood by even a talking monkey, but here we are.

a cruise missle does not damage an area of 1000 miles^2 for 10000 years. it blows up a part of a building. I have to ask - I thought the demographic here was older proffessionals. How did you find yourself here from the high school edgy teen subreddit?

Re:Renewables supplied 65% of new US utility-scale generatin... by Dylan16807 on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @09:40PM (#35983307)
A few big missiles can release as much radiation as chernobyl over a large area if that's what they're designed to do.