News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ... by freejazz on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @05:55PM (#35968275)
Sorry, are you saying that it'd be a problem that pedestrians could cross when they intend to? I'm not following
Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ... by bombcar on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @06:31PM (#35968651)
No, that a human could be standing near but not in a crosswalk, talking. The law says you must treat them as attempting to cross, even though it is obvious they are not. Caress like this abound.
Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ... by freejazz on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @08:24PM (#35969686)
I don't think the law says that you need to treat people not entering a crosswalk as attempting to cross it. We can play this game all day if you just want to be obtuse about using words. But nothing you described was impossible to work out, nor was the scenario you most immediately described in your recent post even remotely troublesome. Do you mean if people are in the crosswalk but don't cross? How often does that really happen? Ironic considering that in this case, the pedestrian was in the crosswalk and the car drove through anyway. Pretty dangerous IMO