Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ...
by mcguire on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @04:01PM
(#35966991)
You realize "it drives like a human being" and "it will surpass [humans in terms of safety?]" are contradictory statements?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ...
by smolder on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @04:36PM
(#35967407)
It's not exactly contradictory. A human can "surpass humans" in the sense of being significantly better than average. If FSD drove like only the best human drivers, you could argue surpassed us in terms of safety.
Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ...
by michaelmior on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @04:34PM
(#35967386)
As written, they are not given that the first is present tense and the second is future tense. There is also some ambiguity surrounding what "like" a human being means in this context, but I could imagine a car driving "like" a human, but safer.
Re:Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” sees pedestrian, chooses not ...
by nuancebydefault on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @04:44PM
(#35967503)
I'm confused. English is not my native language but did I imply anywhere "like a human being"?
I was reasonig about the distance between machine and humans in their driving capabilities. It is clear that there us a gap in favor of humans and the gap is narrowing. Moreso, in the future there will be a surpassing. I don't get the contradiction you see.