Re:Coastal Cities Priced Out Low-Wage Workers. Now College G...
by marssaxman on Monday May 15, 2023 @01:23PM
(#35951528)
What makes you think there is a difference? Seemingly the "story" here is just an explanation of what the person likes about it.
Re:Coastal Cities Priced Out Low-Wage Workers. Now College G...
by dbrueck on Monday May 15, 2023 @06:23PM
(#35955313)
Sure, except that they stated subjective measurements as if they were objective measurements.
Re:Coastal Cities Priced Out Low-Wage Workers. Now College G...
by thatfrenchguy on Monday May 15, 2023 @10:13PM
(#35957084)
I mean all of those are technically objective measurements:
"career opportunities , weather / outdoor activities, quality of food, and cultural enrichment for your children".
It's hard to beat the career opportunities (so far), the weather / outdoor activities ( https://weatherspark.com is awesome weather wise, and a trip to google maps will easily tell you the range of outdoor activities), the quality of food (that you'll have to discover by yourself), and the diversity of cultural enrichment activities for you and your children (same).
It'll cost you plenty of money to live in the bay area for sure, but there's a reason for that.
Hehe, this generalization is way off the mark. It's ok to live in a coastal/urban/whatever area simply because you like it - no need to tell yourself stories to justify it. :)