News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by og_kalu on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:25AM (#35949738)
Requested access way before 100k and still haven't gotten in.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by Mockapapella on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:41AM (#35950051)
been a couple months for me as well. Actually forgot about `claude` and have just been using OpenAI's API instead.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by npsomaratna on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:34AM (#35949905)
Same here. Been waiting for a couple of months now.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by malux85 on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:33AM (#35949885)
Yeah me too, waiting patiently as context windows are our biggest blocker on more complex chemistry simulations
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by peytoncasper on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:42AM (#35950076)
Interesting use case, would you be open to sharing more information on how you're using LLMs for chemistry simulations?
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by og_kalu on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:48AM (#35950175)
Not the person you responded to but these two interesting papers kind of tackle that.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05376 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05332

Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by tikkun on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:28AM (#35949805)
Could you send me an email? I've liked a few of your comments, want to say hi over email. Email in profile.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by weird-eye-issue on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:41AM (#35950048)
Creepy
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by tikkun on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:45AM (#35950116)
Can someone else chime in and let me know whether they agree? Seems like the equivalent of a twitter DM to me, but maybe I'm out of touch.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by og_kalu on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:50AM (#35950209)
Don't think it's particularly creepy and I did send one like you asked, but my email is in my GitHub anyway and not particularly hard to find.

Generally, some might not feel comfortable letting strangers know their email, especially considering this is a site that encourages anonymity. Some might not appreciate doing so publicly either.

Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by rpastuszak on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:07PM (#35950471)
Not creepy at all, although I'd spend 5 minutes checking if I can find the person on Google and then message them via different channels.

If not, I'd leave a way for contacting me first to make it easier for them.

The way I handle these situations: https://sonnet.io/posts/hi

Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by qumpis on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:49AM (#35950195)
I've tried to google the person you replied to, and it they seem to have many social/online media profiles that allow direct contacting. In that case I think publicly reaching out isn't the best way to go and seems out of place, imo.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by tikkun on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:51AM (#35950228)
Good call, I didn't think to do that - thanks
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by detaro on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:14PM (#35950583)
it's fine. I second trying to find a clearly publicized contact channel first, but it's fine and leaves it to the person to reach out or not. (If they don't leave it at that though)
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by ryanklee on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:54AM (#35950276)
I think it's pretty inappropriate. If you have a legit reason to reach out, then you can find a way to do it privately. Letting your private intentions leak into public forums is a bad look and a red flag. If I were the person you are replying to, I'd do my best to not interact with you on the basis of your comment.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by alanfranz on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:10PM (#35950536)
How? There’s no PM feature on HN. This is the only way if the username is unique enough.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by ryanklee on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:43PM (#35951009)
Tough luck then I guess? I suppose I don't see the need to have access to every individual on a private basis merely because they comment somewhere on the internet. If they welcomed private interactions, then they would indicate a means of contact in their profile.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by mrtranscendence on Monday May 15, 2023 @02:14PM (#35952274)
I mean, if the person being contacted doesn’t want to be contacted privately, they’re free to ignore the request. No one’s saying they “need” access or that someone else is fully obligated to talk to them privately.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by ryanklee on Monday May 15, 2023 @03:05PM (#35953074)
Just reminding you that the commenter asked for others to offer their take on whether or not the request was perceived to be creepy. I didn't go out of my way to offer unsolicited commentary on this.

If you don't want to hear that you are wearing an ugly shirt, don't ask an entire room full of people if your shirt is ugly.

Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by alanfranz on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @02:53AM (#35958492)
Ok, but you haven’t explained _why_ this would be inappropriate. If there’s no other way to contact sb, I’ll reach out with a comment where I can. I did this on twitter once. Worst that can happen is that I get no answer, but I don’t see any creepiness.

I suppose most people on HN don’t include a public address in their profile because it’s not required (not even your email is required), not because they don’t want any direct interaction.

Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by barry-cotter on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:15PM (#35950603)
If I were a human being reading your comment I would infer that you were highly judgmental and thought other people were mostly like you, looking for an excuse to be hostile and dismissive. Thankfully I know that most people are at worst indifferent and there’s a large very friendly, helpful minority and even more who will do small favours out of kindness. The more we make it clear that most people are not like you the more we make the world a better place.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by ryanklee on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:37PM (#35950924)
The Internet is full of individuals with weird intentions. I don't at all see how being conservative in the kind of interactions one allows for is a bad idea.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by barry-cotter on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:20PM (#35950667)
Some people, the kind of people who use the word cringe unironically, live in a world where other people look at them and judge them all the time and they care about what these strangers think and will mole their personality and behaviour to avoid this. They stand as a warning to others not too be like that.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by stormfather on Monday May 15, 2023 @02:30PM (#35952539)
I disagree that it's creepy. It's more just unusual. But people on HN are quick to judge the slightest thing. I think being a programmer does that to one's brain, unfortunately.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by csomar on Monday May 15, 2023 @09:45PM (#35956891)
I think this is the non regular part: "I've liked a few of your comments". You can directly ask for email/contact, there is nothing wrong with that.
Re:Anthropic's 100k context is now available in the web UI by s3p on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:30PM (#35950823)
This is not creepy at all. Sometimes people can reach out because they genuinely want to have a nice conversation.