Re:FBI agents accuse CIA of 9/11 coverup
by philosopher1234 on Thursday May 11, 2023 @09:48PM
(#35910893)
They might not settle on that as the most likely interpretation, but I would bet money that it was one of if not the first interpretation that came to mind for most. I think title authors are accountable for such things, and less discriminating readers will not make their way all the way to more reasonable interpretations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI agents accuse CIA of 9/11 coverup
by cogitoergofutuo on Friday May 12, 2023 @02:11AM
(#35912589)
It is not the author’s job to proactively search out and adjust for crazy interpretations of mundane sentences. That rule would be funny.
“NOAA reports record hurricane activity — BUT DON’T WORRY HAARP ISN’T INVOLVED” would be a hilarious but pointless headline.