News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Startups Are Scooping Up Big Tech’s Cast-Off Workers by zer0tonin on Thursday May 11, 2023 @01:05PM (#35905020)
Everyone in a team might know who the underperformers are. But team members and EM are kept out of layoff-related decisions, which are generally done by upper management with the help of external consultants. Those external consultants are about as good as a random number generator.
Re:Startups Are Scooping Up Big Tech’s Cast-Off Workers by ghaff on Thursday May 11, 2023 @01:45PM (#35905605)
People are also only fungible to a limited degree. Companies cancel projects, eliminate functions, and so forth. Especially in the middle of a large layoff there's often a limited appetite for finding a new home for someone who may be a high performer in the abstract but doesn't have a job any longer and may not be an ideal match for a position that already has someone doing it.
Re:Startups Are Scooping Up Big Tech’s Cast-Off Workers by JohnFen on Friday May 12, 2023 @12:51PM (#35918777)
This is my experience. The last company I worked for that did layoffs while I was there was an example. None of the middle managers had any input in the firing decisions at all. They were just given a list of names by upper management. They were very upset about it, because they couldn't lay off people that were underperforming and were forced to lay off people who were critical or performed very well. Many of them said that it didn't appear that the decision-makers even looked at performance reviews, either. It appeared random.