News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by ben_w on Thursday May 11, 2023 @03:22AM (#35898886)
> Serving an infinite video catalog is very expensive in terms of all resources

How much would they save if "free" users only got 480p videos?

I'd be fine with 480p resolution.

Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by geraldhh on Thursday May 11, 2023 @03:28AM (#35898941)
don't be so modest.

720p is an acceptable low bar

Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by ben_w on Thursday May 11, 2023 @05:00AM (#35899598)
For me, 480p is not even modest, it's close to the height I get for a landscape video when holding my phone in portrait.

I also don't usually need the extra pixels, as there is seldom important content in the fine details — a few years ago, when I was prepping to leave the UK but not everything lined up to the same dates, I was using PAYG mobile for home internet and therefore set the videos to 240p; the only reason that didn't really work was that not all videos had such low resolution, and when they didn't the site defaulted to 720p.

Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by geraldhh on Thursday May 11, 2023 @05:17AM (#35899733)
yea, 480p is ok for phones.

720p brings a noticeable improvement for watching on something 40"+ (tv).

going further to 1080p is only a marginal improvement over 720p so i usually "keep it simple/small"