Just a passerby, but content isn't fungible; no one is replacing Technology Connections with House of the Dragon or vice versa. The diversity of YouTube's content, the back catalog, its default status, network effects, integration with devices and services, and so much more make it hard to replace.

And we shouldn't forget, rando users can upload whatever for sharing, which none of your alternatives do. Kind of the core idea there.

I love Technology Connections FWIW, completely changed how I use my dishwasher!

And I would disagree re: content isn't fungible. Nothing on YouTube is both necessary to specifically consume and entirely unavailable elsewhere. It's entertainment, and whatever "category" of entertainment you prefer, you can find content not on YouTube for that thing.

"Random users uploading content" has not been the primary use case of YouTube for many years now. It's mostly run by content creators now, with entire companies dedicated to creating content, just the same as the platforms I've listed.

Extremely obvious case of apples not being oranges, in the sense of user-generated content not being the same as studio/production company generated content.

> So no, I don't really agree that YouTube has a monopoly. Too many alternatives that kick ass!

None of those are YouTube alternatives. They are not even remotely similar. You haven't got a clue what YouTube is about.

Here's a list of YouTube alternatives:

* Rumble

* Odysee

* Vimeo

* Twitch

* BitChute

But the alternatives are niche platforms with nowhere near the level of content that YouTube provides.