Re:Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM I...
by throwaway2037 on Wednesday May 10, 2023 @12:12AM
(#35883577)
A significant portion of Mainland Chinese Internet users have access to a VPN. They can read the whole Internet. It's been that way for about 10 years. Why isn't it "game over" yet for the Chinese Communist Party? How about Myanmar or Cambodia, which have much less sophisticated national Internet firewalls? Still going dictator-strong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM I...
by mensetmanusman on Wednesday May 10, 2023 @04:31AM
(#35885076)
30% is high, but maybe not enough to make a big difference in such a police state.
Re:Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM I...
by throwaway290 on Wednesday May 10, 2023 @04:36AM
(#35885104)
The point missed by the comment whom you reply to is that tech that enables information sharing (Internet, VPN, comms satellites) comes together with tech that allows for more effective population control and propaganda (great firewall, surveillance satellites, social karma, "everything app", electronic money). It's back to the human factor again: if you don't have protections against dictatorship tech won't help you, but if you do have democracy you don't care about that fancy tech.
Re:Internet disrupted in Pakistan amid arrest of former PM I...
by patrakov on Wednesday May 10, 2023 @06:15AM
(#35885565)
That's only on paper. During anniversaries of various politically important events, access to the foreign segment of the Internet is slowed down, infected with packet loss, and disrupted in other ways so that VPNs become practically unusable. This obviously affects not only VPNs, but other kinds of traffic.
Source: I worked for a company that had an office in China, and was responsible for maintaining the Chinese servers. In that case, I had to troubleshoot multi-hour MySQL replication lags. Solved by switching the TCP implementation to BBR, because it is resistant to packet loss.