Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by ojhughes on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @07:38AM
(#35872778)
Driving around the country at the time was ignoring guidance rather breaking any law
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by _joel on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @07:47AM
(#35872857)
Especially if you go to get your eyes tested at Barnard castle
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by hanoz on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @07:55AM
(#35872963)
No, it was law. Immoral law which deserved to be broken, but that is no consolation to the millions who suffered greatly by going along with it.
To hear one of the most shameful periods in our legal history being brushed off as couple of months of half hearted barely observed lockdown is pretty disturbing.
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by happymellon on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @11:03AM
(#35875403)
Please point to the law.
Because you are just making stuff up now.
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by hanoz on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @11:38AM
(#35876025)
The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/pdfs/uksi_20200...
Restrictions on movement
6.—(1) During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by happymellon on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @11:12AM
(#35875534)
Guidance was to not travel unless you had to.
Driving around still happened, as some of us need to do it to support systems. There were plenty of lorries and cars on the road.