News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SkyLink – Bluesky DID Detector browser plugin by progval on Monday May 08, 2023 @02:36AM (#35858769)
Actually it needs to use an HTTP API (because Web Extensions can't send actual DNS requests?): https://github.com/jessejanderson/skylink/blob/a698dd56eda26...

and it looks like it's only resolving domains to DIDs, but not that the DID's owner accepted the domain; so you could make any of your domains point to anyone's DID. The extension would need to use ATP's new protocol to check it.

Re:SkyLink – Bluesky DID Detector browser plugin by darnfish on Monday May 08, 2023 @03:00AM (#35858877)
DNS over HTTP is still a DNS request
Re:SkyLink – Bluesky DID Detector browser plugin by reflexco on Monday May 08, 2023 @05:47AM (#35859803)
Whether it can technically be called a DNS request or not, this is a privacy leak for anyone who isn't already using Google as a DOH provider. So this should really be written on the extension page...
Re:SkyLink – Bluesky DID Detector browser plugin by progval on Monday May 08, 2023 @06:41AM (#35860102)
That seems to be a custom Google API, not DNS over HTTP(S). Request format is very different from what is specified in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8484 (/dns-query?dns= followed by raw DNS bytes). But sure, the implementation could easily be changed to use DoH