News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again by brookst on Sunday May 07, 2023 @12:45PM (#35853238)
> physical things last a long time

There's a lot of survivor bias here. I have had plenty of dumb physical things fail in what seems like unreasonably short times.

But I do have done physical dumb devices that are 100+ years old. I do not interpret that to mean that everything from that era / factory / manufacturer lasts 100 years, just that all of the surviving items did.

Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again by clnq on Sunday May 07, 2023 @01:19PM (#35853533)
Reliability of anything can be described by the same generic bathtub curve — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve. We used to have a lot of technology that would wear out very slowly, but early failure was more common. Now most technology doesn't last more than a year or two, but generally doesn't fail upfront.
Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again by notjoemama on Sunday May 07, 2023 @02:09PM (#35853984)
> But I do have done physical dumb devices

Can you rephrase this? I don't understand the point you're making. Two verbs against the same subject but with different temporal context, perhaps you stuggle with communicating sometimes?

Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again by uoaei on Sunday May 07, 2023 @03:18PM (#35854658)
Obviously a typo -- done -> some

This is a weirdly confrontational comment.

Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again by titzer on Sunday May 07, 2023 @03:39PM (#35854869)
> physical dumb devices

Physical dumb devices that are 100+ years old are usually made out of pretty durable, but individually replaceable parts. Thus they get fixed if they do break. The mechanisms are usually pretty easy to figure out, so you can spot if a spring is broken, a bolt is loose, a thing stopped turning, etc.