Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again
by nobodyandproud on Sunday May 07, 2023 @12:14PM
(#35852950)
Right to repair?
Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again
by __MatrixMan__ on Sunday May 07, 2023 @02:06PM
(#35853966)
It's in that direction, but I think existing right to repair legislation stops short of the right to exclude dependency on the manufacturer's infrastructure entirely.
Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again
by clnq on Sunday May 07, 2023 @01:15PM
(#35853516)
Or it could be done like GDPR — requiring consent and explaining what addresses the device will communicate to, what data will be sent, when, and for what purpose. GDPR requires that every purpose of personal data use is consented to and explained the same way — what data is collected, where it is processed, for how long it is retained, and for what purpose. New tech privacy laws could* definitely use something like this as a starting point.
* Assuming no malicious lobbying.
Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again
by behnamoh on Sunday May 07, 2023 @02:00PM
(#35853915)
> - turn off the phoning home without breaking local functionality
Start with Windows, iOS (Siri), and pretty much any updateable software.
Re:I'm never investing in Google's smart home ecosystem again
by __MatrixMan__ on Sunday May 07, 2023 @06:05PM
(#35856062)
There's updatable software that only updates when you tell it, and only to the version you tell it to, but it's certainly not the norm.
Let's change that. Anything less is a RCE vulnerability.
- turn off the phoning home without breaking local functionality
- set the "home" address to something on the lan, plus document the API
- install a cert so I can MITM the traffic and see what they're phoning home about