News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's End Adolescence by DanielBMarkham on Sunday November 09, 2008 @10:13AM (#358288)
Is this starting to become like "I, for one, welcome our new X overlords?" is on Slashdot?

PG wrote everything. Let's take that as a given. Now can we move on?

I'm not trying to be persnickety, but your comment adds absolutely nothing to the discussion and sounds like fanboy tripe. If PGs article was on here, we could talk about that. But it's not. AFAIK, every one of PG's articles has already appeared on here and we've already talked about it. So on with the new material, okay?

Re:Let's End Adolescence by mnemonicsloth on Sunday November 09, 2008 @02:40PM (#358450)
You're not being persnickety. You're rushing to judgment because it gives you an excuse to put on a big show of pwning me-the-thoughtless-fanboy.

"X and Y are the same" is a lesson we all learned on Sesame Street, and isn't much worth discussing.

Rather than give some kind of credit to PG for anticipating NG, I wanted to point out how weird it is for the two of them to be agreeing. Gingrich is respectful of tradition and has a politician's instincts for rationalization and euphemism. Graham has said (along with everything else) that groups of people are inherently dumb and lazy, and is almost contemptuously truthful.

There's plenty of real intellectual content in there if you take the time to dig for it, and much of it is cool and subversive...

Re:Let's End Adolescence by aswanson on Sunday November 09, 2008 @10:19AM (#358290)
Sorry, Dan, but the strange loop generated by what I am submitting here is irresistible. Cheers: http://www.whattofix.com/blog/archives/2007/12/the_guy.php
Re:Let's End Adolescence by bjelkeman-again on Sunday November 09, 2008 @02:58PM (#358464)
Thanks. That really threw me in a loop.