Re:Google “We Have No Moat, and Neither Does OpenAI”
by duderific on Thursday May 04, 2023 @08:11PM
(#35823817)
If it is seamlessly integrated, the AI won't even surface in a UI. You will just be presented with different options in the UI, which theoretically would be more precisely curated by the AI that you don't even see.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google “We Have No Moat, and Neither Does OpenAI”
by CuriouslyC on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:19PM
(#35824565)
That runs counter to some very well established UI principles. People get confused when their interface changes except as a result of direct interaction. Open up a menu in response to a click, yes; reorganize menus to "optimize" them based on what a model predicts a person is going to do, no.
The killer is being able to tell a program what you want it to do, then not having to fuddle with buttons or menus at all (unless you want to tweak things).
Re:Google “We Have No Moat, and Neither Does OpenAI”
by ukuina on Friday May 05, 2023 @02:21AM
(#35825806)
While I agree in principle, AI-infusion in UIs does not need to break convention. For example, AI suggestions could subtly highlight menu options that would be most useful in an auto-detected workflow. We could also create a persistent area on the UI for the AI to "speak up".