News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Land Ownership Makes No Sense by garrisonj on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:14AM (#35815660)
I grew up in Oregon, where all the beaches are public. Later I discovered that some people in different places owned beaches, which blew my mind. How can you own a beach?

I then wondered why I felt that way about beaches, but not about other lands.

Re:Land Ownership Makes No Sense by toomuchtodo on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:27AM (#35815884)
Re:Land Ownership Makes No Sense by engineer_22 on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:22AM (#35815816)
The history of it would be interesting to learn

Edit: someone found a loophole and it got grandfathered.

https://www.opb.org/news/article/history-oregon-tom-mccall-p...

Re:Land Ownership Makes No Sense by legitster on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:46AM (#35816196)
I love public coasts. Land in the US West in general was also divvied out much more as public in general.

It helps though that beaches are of only limited developmental value.

Re:Land Ownership Makes No Sense by soco on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:49AM (#35816236)
In Switzerland all lake shores are public land. And most of them (most of the usable parts at least) are fenced out by local prominent people owning villas nearby, and nobody moves a finger about it because as I said they are prominent (politicians, TV stars, Tina Turner...). And when I mean nobody I really mean nobody - there aren't even teenagers rebelling, it looks like an societary accepted evil.
Re:Land Ownership Makes No Sense by xnx on Thursday May 04, 2023 @11:31AM (#35817006)
Sometimes the beaches are public, but the rich try to block access: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/01/08/califor...