Given that reddit surprisingly still has a working API, this isn't actually a hard thing to check. Here's a script that works courtesy of ChatGPT:

https://gist.github.com/bspammer/6b5eff6670e4b839ffea89ceaed...

The highest non-bot user moderates 12 subreddits in the top 100. There's quite a few users who moderate more than 5. I believe the situation was much worse a few years ago, and reddit the company put pressure on them to give up some of their subs.

Can you provide the data that is output?

The highest person on there that isn't a bot moderates 13 subreddits. The second 12, and down from there. Doesn't look like anywhere near '92' for any 5 people.

Yes because like I said the fallout from the original post caused a lot of the power moderators to give up their spots. The biggest one "Cyxie" straight up deleted their account.

Ah, so the fact was wrong.

Cyxie just moved to the account TreKs

This is a list of accounts, not persons. One person could be operating several of these accounts.

Yes, that could be. It could also be two people for each account. We can make lots of conjecture, can't we?

.. the mods of most subreddits are public. This is a trivial thing to verify. It's as valid as any other information posted that you haven't personally inspected. I have no idea why you're so belligerent about this, but it's odd.

If it is so trivial then verify it and come back with verification instead of stating your confusion as to my tone.

How am I supposed to do that? You don't accept other people's verification of information.

The person above you just did it. It's called 'show your work'. And it doesn't show what the parent says, at all.

Almost like if you read the followups, those few power mods created multiple alt accounts in the wake of the post.

But keep acting super weird about this, I guess.

Asking for proof is 'super weird' but 'conspiracy of reddit mods' is not?

No, a conspiracy of Reddit mods is not super weird.

Cliques of petty tyrants are nothing new on or off the internet.

What’s weird is thinking Reddit is somehow immune to human nature.

Sorry but 'human nature' doesn't preclude need for proof. Just because something seems plausible doesn't make it evidence that it happened.

There’s plenty of proof a Google search away. This wasn’t some great secret.

Yeah I have been asking for it and gotten either 'search for it, it is easy to find' or a runaround where people claim to have it and then don't. So, provide it or stop asserting that you have it.