News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by hef19898 on Saturday April 29, 2023 @11:57AM (#35754115)
I see a resurected Theranos on the horizon. This time powered by by ChatGPT. What could go wrong?
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by alexb_ on Saturday April 29, 2023 @03:58PM (#35756568)
Funny enough, I'm actually developing an AI-powered biomedical technological breakthrough that's about to disrupt the medical industry. It uses wearables to enable a blockchain-enabled data management system that also functions as a cloud based SaaS provider, linking with ChatGPT and NFTs to create value for those who are underprivileged, all with only 1 drop of blood. If you want to further this please give me a few billion dollars and I promise something might come :)
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by snovv_crash on Saturday April 29, 2023 @04:57PM (#35757112)
I'm only interested if the blood is delivered by drones.
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by Firmwarrior on Saturday April 29, 2023 @09:01PM (#35758776)
Sounds like it's not very eco friendly..
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by chaxor on Saturday April 29, 2023 @07:32PM (#35758334)
Theranos wasn't a bad idea, and is actually possible. It is extremely unfortunate that it was so badly mismanaged.
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by hef19898 on Sunday April 30, 2023 @02:58AM (#35760262)
Theranos was a fraud, selling a service based on technology that simply doesn't exist.
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by chaxor on Thursday May 04, 2023 @01:21AM (#35811528)
Of course... that's absolutely true, and I didn't say otherwise.

However, the basic idea actually is possible, but only for a very select few of the tests they proposed (which they still unfortunately didn't really get right of course). My point is that, unfortunately, the tests that are possible to do now won't get a company to form out of it - simply because they ruined the scene for everyone. Anyone trying to get a company going in this area and raising money for it will be met with a complete block of resistance because of the precedent set, even if the technology is actually completely reliable.

Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by Retric on Sunday April 30, 2023 @03:41PM (#35765934)
No, the variability of individual drops of blood are too high for the precision needed to do most of the tests they where proposing. Worse you get excessive contamination between blood and other substances from a finger prick.

So, no very quickly people were calling Theranos either incompetent or fraudulent.

Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by chaxor on Thursday May 04, 2023 @01:16AM (#35811508)
"the tests they were proposing" - yeah, I would agree that some (probably most towards the end) of the tests they were trying to make part of the product were a big part of why they were so fraudulent. I agree that it was a bad company.

My point is that the general idea was not a bad idea, and because it was so badly mismanaged (trying to add too many products and run before walking, using other companies' tech illegally, etc, etc) we now are worse off because few people want to attempt doing the possible ideas in this space (because people think none of it is possible - which is simply not true).

The company that could reliably be made is far less 'attractive' of course, but it would still be quite beneficial.

Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by 77pt77 on Sunday April 30, 2023 @06:03AM (#35761142)
Chatgpt can't get pregnant when things go wrong in order to soften the blow.