News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Quicssh: SSH over QUIC. Parent comment

Re:Quicssh: SSH over QUIC by FrancoisBosun on Thursday April 27, 2023 @11:57AM (#35730001)
Mosh has latency-hiding mechanisms. I used mosh for a bit on while riding a bus. Latency-hiding helped quite a bit to keep the UI responsive.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Quicssh: SSH over QUIC by cl3misch on Thursday April 27, 2023 @04:51PM (#35734388)
Do you mean UI as in X forwarding? I thought this wasn't possible, which kept me from using mosh so far.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Quicssh: SSH over QUIC by tempay on Thursday April 27, 2023 @05:54PM (#35735084)
They mean UI as in for command lines, like vim/emacs/shells
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Quicssh: SSH over QUIC by egberts1 on Friday April 28, 2023 @01:30PM (#35744441)
TUI, better?

UI is just plain ol' things for user to interact with computer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Quicssh: SSH over QUIC by NoZebra120vClip on Thursday April 27, 2023 @09:38PM (#35736603)
The "G" in "GUI" stands for "graphical". Some people use "TUI" to mean "Terminal User Interface". It therefore follows that someone using merely "UI" has not specified the type of interface.
[ Parent | on HN ]