You'd think they could have just left that question out of their FAQ and licensed it with a "free-as-in-beer" click-through license.
Probably. They were hoping that the less-informed (like me) would see "The Datomic binaries are being released under the Apache 2.0 license" and think "Datomic is relicensed under Apache 2.0".
It worked for Docker Desktop and BSC.
The products even have github repos! There's just no source in them.
It's open source cosplay.
Were they hoping that people wouldn't notice?