News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DuckDuckGo removed the ability to filter search results by freediver on Monday April 24, 2023 @03:06AM (#35684492)
Searches are not tied to an account, Kagi does not even log searches. [1]

What would be the point when your search history would just be a liability? That is the whole point of the paid search business model.

[1] https://kagi.com/privacy

Re:DuckDuckGo removed the ability to filter search results by doubtfulcan on Monday April 24, 2023 @04:57AM (#35685188)
How would Kagi enforce quotas if they can't link searches to the account paying for them?
Re:DuckDuckGo removed the ability to filter search results by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Monday April 24, 2023 @05:25AM (#35685370)
IP address. The classic example is scholarly/academic journals. Access by subscribing university libraries and corporations is still generally dependent on IP address. It has been this way for as long as I can remember. Early 90s at least.

An expected retort might be "But consumer IP addresses are subject to change." True, but sometimes a "static" IP is non-negotiable. For example, in the past if one subscribed to ICANN's zone file access program, which is public information open to access by anyone, not only university libraries or corporations, a static IP address had to be provided. Of course one could use a consumer IP address because those can change infrequently, sometimes on a timescale of years. If it ever changed then one had to execute a new agreement. Perhaps the requirement for a static IP has been dropped but I honestly doubt it.

Rate-limiting/access control by IP address is common and straightforward.

However so-called "tech" companies have shown they cannot be trusted when collecting information from users. For example, Twitter and Facebook each claimed they were requesting phone numbers from users for "security" reasons but it turned out they were using them for commercial purposes.

Re:DuckDuckGo removed the ability to filter search results by doubtfulcan on Monday April 24, 2023 @05:34AM (#35685423)
Wouldn't they have to validate a paying customer to tie it to an IP aswell? If there is a point where a user is identifiable, it can't be rolled back with a "trust us" in my opinion if the focus is privacy.
Re:DuckDuckGo removed the ability to filter search results by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Monday April 24, 2023 @06:35AM (#35685812)
Sometimes service providers on the internet try to accomodate "anonymous" payment via wire transfer, etc. instead of only accepting credit card payment. VPNs are one example. Whether this is truly "anonymous" is debatable. The question is whether the service provider retains payment information after payment is made and if so, why. To provide service, arguably the provider only needs to know "this IP address is paid up through [date]". It does not need to know IP address 1.2.3.4 is John Smith's IP address. It does not need to collect or retain any information about John Smith.
Re:DuckDuckGo removed the ability to filter search results by freediver on Monday April 24, 2023 @02:10PM (#35691084)
We just increase search counter by one.